Can I vibecode AmICited?

KINDA · weekend project
price $54/moyou'd save $648/yrbuild time multi-daycategory 📈 seo & marketingreplaced by 0 people

The scoring loop is genuinely weekend-buildable, but a faithful replacement is not, and that gap is the honest reason to keep paying. The naive personal build sends your questions through the model APIs, but API answers are not what a real user sees when they open ChatGPT, Perplexity, or AI Overviews, so that number is only a proxy. AmICited does not use LLM APIs at all: it drives real browsers to ask the actual consumer surfaces the way a person in a given country would, a browser-automation fleet routed through country-level proxies, kept working as every surface changes. The other gaps are the historical archive that compounds from day one and cannot be backfilled, an MCP server that lets your AI agents act on your visibility gaps, and, on higher plans, human AEO consulting from real experience that no script replaces. You can build the weekend proxy; the prompt below is that honest consolation build, with its limits stated plainly.

the prompt
Build me a local AI answer-engine citation tracker for one brand, as a rough personal proxy. Requirements:

- Node 22, TypeScript, SQLite via better-sqlite3, a CLI, and a plain server-rendered
  dashboard. Local only, no accounts, no telemetry.
- brand.json holds my brand name, aliases, domain, and competitor names. prompts.json
  holds up to 50 buyer questions.
- `track run` sends every prompt through OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Perplexity, and xAI
  (Grok) with each provider's web search or grounding tool enabled. Keys live in .env.
- Store one immutable row per run, prompt, and provider: the full raw answer, cited
  URLs, model id, latency, and error text. Never overwrite an existing run, so the
  archive compounds over time.
- Cap concurrency at 3 per provider, retry twice on 429 and 5xx with backoff, and keep
  failed cells visible in the report instead of dropping them.
- Detect brand and competitor mentions case-insensitively using the alias list, and
  record the first-mention character offset as a crude prominence proxy.
- Normalize citations to hostname plus canonical path, strip tracking parameters, then
  compute owned-domain citation share and a top 25 cited-sources table.
- `track serve` renders visibility per provider over time, share of voice against each
  competitor, the sources table, and the prompts where competitors are cited and I am
  not (the gap list is the point).
- `track export` writes runs, mentions, and citations to CSV.
- Fixture tests for mention detection and URL normalization.
- Out of scope, and be honest in the README that these are exactly what a paid product
  like this sells: the real consumer surfaces (this uses model APIs, which do NOT match
  what the ChatGPT app, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, or Grok actually serve users),
  country-specific results via a proxied real-browser fleet, running that fleet at
  scale, and any human AEO consulting. Do not try to automate the consumer web UIs.
- README: setup, a per-run cost estimate, a cron line for daily runs, and a plain note
  that API answers only approximate what users actually see.

$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter) or copy it raw

why people still pay

Because the scoring is the cheap half and everything real is the expensive half. AmICited does not call the model APIs, it drives real browsers through country-level proxies to capture what users genuinely see, which is faithful and hard to run at scale and keep working as the surfaces change. It stores every full answer so the value compounds into a history you cannot recreate once you start late, exposes an MCP server so your AI agents can act on the gaps, and on higher plans adds human AEO consulting that acts on your data from real experience. A personal API script gives you a rough proxy; it does not give you any of that.

what you lose

xthe faithful signal: API answers only approximate what the ChatGPT app, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, and Grok actually serve real users, which is what AmICited measures with real browsers

xcountry-level results: what users see varies by geography, which needs a proxy fleet a solo build will not stand up

xscale and reliability: running and retrying thousands of real browser sessions in parallel is the hard engineering, not the scoring

xmonths of stored answers and competitor baselines, without which a single week's visibility number is noise, and which you cannot backfill once you start late

xhuman AEO consultations on higher plans, advice from real experience acting on your data, which no self-hosted script reproduces

share on X ↗"I just replaced AmICited ($54/mo) with one prompt"
the escape hatch

Don't feel like building it? These folks already made it free.

ElmoSelf-hosted AEO tracker covering the API-proxy scoring loop; it queries model APIs, which is exactly the faithfulness gap the paid product exists to cross.230aug 2026open source

no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real

questions
Can I vibecode AmICited?

Kinda. The core of AmICited is buildable in a weekend with the prompt on this page, but there are real gaps: the faithful signal: API answers only approximate what the ChatGPT app, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, and Grok actually serve real users, which is what AmICited measures with real browsers, country-level results: what users see varies by geography, which needs a proxy fleet a solo build will not stand up. Read the honest list above before committing.

How much does AmICited cost?

AmICited costs about $54/month (Starter, checked 2026-08-04), which is $648 per year.

What do I lose by replacing AmICited?

Honestly: the faithful signal: API answers only approximate what the ChatGPT app, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Copilot, and Grok actually serve real users, which is what AmICited measures with real browsers; country-level results: what users see varies by geography, which needs a proxy fleet a solo build will not stand up; scale and reliability: running and retrying thousands of real browser sessions in parallel is the hard engineering, not the scoring; months of stored answers and competitor baselines, without which a single week's visibility number is noise, and which you cannot backfill once you start late; human AEO consultations on higher plans, advice from real experience acting on your data, which no self-hosted script reproduces. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.

Is there an open-source alternative to AmICited?

Yes: Elmo (Self-hosted AEO tracker covering the API-proxy scoring loop; it queries model APIs, which is exactly the faithfulness gap the paid product exists to cross.) The prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.

Every week, more subscriptions die.

New verdicts, new prompts, the week's most-doomed apps.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

free forever · no scanner spam · the prompt stays on the site, the deaths come to you

$weekly: what got a verdict, what died.