Can I vibecode LLM Pulse?
KINDA · weekend projectThe core loop is a realistic weekend build: run a fixed prompt set against a model API, detect brand and competitor mentions, collect citations, and chart the results. The gap appears when you need dependable runs across many models, long-term evidence, team access, exports, alerts, and the broader visibility and reputation workflow.
Build a local, single-user AI visibility tracker for one brand. Use Node.js 22, TypeScript, Express, better-sqlite3, server-rendered HTML, and vanilla JavaScript. Bind the app to localhost:4173 and provide one documented command for the first run. Keep MODEL_BASE_URL, MODEL_API_KEY, and MODEL_NAME in .env and ship a safe .env.example. Support one JSON chat endpoint configured entirely through those environment variables. Document the endpoint contract and isolate it behind one small adapter so it can be replaced later. Let the user configure one brand, aliases, three competitors, and up to 25 prompts. Run prompts manually and on a weekly local schedule with a clear API budget limit. Limit concurrency, retry transient failures, and keep failed prompts visible instead of dropping them. Store every prompt, raw answer, model name, timestamp, latency, and error in SQLite. Detect case-insensitive brand and competitor mentions using editable aliases. Extract and normalize URLs from answers, then preserve the source answer for every citation. Use one structured model pass to label brand sentiment as positive, neutral, negative, or absent. Calculate mention rate, citation rate, competitor share of voice, and net sentiment with documented formulas. Show current results, weekly trends, and a prompt-level evidence table on a compact dashboard. Make every aggregate metric link back to the raw answers used to calculate it. Export prompts, answers, mentions, citations, and weekly metrics as CSV files. Add backup and restore commands for the SQLite database. Do not add accounts, billing, teams, telemetry, web crawling, or an integration catalog. Do not claim parity with managed multi-model collection, reputation workflows, traffic analytics, or production monitoring. Write tests for alias matching, URL normalization, retry handling, and metric calculations. Include a README with setup, API cost controls, data location, backup steps, and limitations. Run the tests and production build before finishing, then list the exact commands used.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter) or copy it raw
prompt copied. verdicts flip when models improve.
five vibe-coding tips + the verdicts that changed. thursdays, free, one-click out.
Teams pay to keep large prompt sets running on schedule, preserve evidence over time, and analyze mentions, citations, sentiment, competitors, and traffic in one dependable workflow without maintaining the execution pipeline themselves.
xmanaged execution across the full model set
xlong-term historical comparisons and evidence
xreputation, source, traffic, and competitor workflows
xteam permissions, exports, alerts, and integrations
xproduction monitoring and support
Don't feel like building it? These folks already made it free.
no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real
LLM Pulse pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| starter weekly | $56.52/workspace | $47.09/workspace | 1 project; 50 prompts; 50 AI responses/week/model; 10 competitors. |
| growth weekly | $114.19/workspace | $95.16/workspace | 2 projects; 150 prompts; 150 AI responses/week/model; 15 competitors. |
| scale weekly | $344.87/workspace | $287.39/workspace | 5 projects; 450 prompts; 450 AI responses/week/model; 20 competitors. |
| scale+ weekly | $690.89/workspace | $575.74/workspace | 10 projects; 1,200 prompts; 1,200 AI responses/week/model; 20 competitors. |
| scale++ weekly | $1382.93/workspace | $1152.44/workspace | 15 projects; 2,400 prompts; 2,400 AI responses/week/model; 25 competitors. |
| starter daily | $91.12/workspace | $75.93/workspace | 1 project; 50 prompts; 50 AI responses/day/model; 10 competitors. |
| growth daily | $171.86/workspace | $143.22/workspace | 2 projects; 150 prompts; 150 AI responses/day/model; 15 competitors. |
| scale daily | $517.88/workspace | $431.57/workspace | 5 projects; 450 prompts; 450 AI responses/day/model; 20 competitors. |
| scale+ daily | $1036.91/workspace | $864.09/workspace | 10 projects; 1,200 prompts; 1,200 AI responses/day/model; 20 competitors. |
| scale++ daily | $2190.31/workspace | $1825.26/workspace | 15 projects; 2,400 prompts; 2,400 AI responses/day/model; 25 competitors. |
| enterprise | custom | — | Custom projects, prompt volume, refresh frequency, model coverage, data access, and support. |
free tierno free tier; 14-day card-required trial on weekly Starter, Growth, and Scale only; daily plans and Scale+/Scale++ start immediately
billingmonthly + annual (annual is billed for 10 months, effectively 2 months free); VAT/tax may be added
hidden costsAdditional AI models are sold as paid add-ons; public add-on rates are not disclosed.
verified 2026-08-14 · source ↗
Can I vibecode LLM Pulse?
Kinda. The core of LLM Pulse is buildable in a weekend with the prompt on this page, but there are real gaps: managed execution across the full model set, long-term historical comparisons and evidence. Read the honest list above before committing.
How much does LLM Pulse cost?
LLM Pulse costs about $56.52/month (Starter Weekly, checked 2026-08-14), which is $678.24 per year.
What do I lose by replacing LLM Pulse?
Honestly: managed execution across the full model set; long-term historical comparisons and evidence; reputation, source, traffic, and competitor workflows; team permissions, exports, alerts, and integrations; production monitoring and support. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to LLM Pulse?
Yes: Elmo (Tracks mentions, citations and competitors across the major engines; sentiment and referral traffic are still on the road map.) The prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.